/*
* Copyright (c) 1999, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
*
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
* accompanied this code).
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
*
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
* questions.
*/
/*
* @test
* @bug 4099995 4118025
* @summary Bad optimization of "switch" statement
* @author dps
*
* @run clean Switch1
* @run compile -O Switch1.java
* @run main Switch1
*/
public class Switch1
{
public static void main (String argc[])
{
for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
String ret;
ret = test(0);
if (ret.equals("Error"))
throw new RuntimeException("test(0) = Error");
System.out.println("test(0) = " + ret);
ret = test(1);
if (ret.equals("Error"))
throw new RuntimeException("test(1) = Error");
System.out.println("test(1) = " + ret);
}
}
private static String test (int i)
{
switch (i) {
case 0:
return ("found 0");
case 1:
return ("found 1");
}
return ("Error");
}
}