History log of /hets/PGIP/Output/Formatting.hs
Revision Date Author Comments Expand
26f0691ae6929941ee21ca3d33732a0ce45a8079 06-May-2015 cmaeder <c.maeder@jacobs-university.de>

removed getWebProverName

bb39f9f3b231588a5ed36d424ae27c6e31852fea 06-May-2015 Eugen Kuksa <eugenk@informatik.uni-bremen.de>

Avoid qualification.

ceb5bd32f163b29b1cbea577334bc869c07add04 06-May-2015 Eugen Kuksa <eugenk@informatik.uni-bremen.de>

Remove proverOrConsCheckerName.

5fa563f0173e7791139e4229800fc91652293647 06-May-2015 Eugen Kuksa <eugenk@informatik.uni-bremen.de>

Raname removeFunnyChars to mkNiceProverName.

db5f94b6009ee3a1a4f62a3bd1583a7b3ee96db8 06-May-2015 Eugen Kuksa <eugenk@informatik.uni-bremen.de>

Move ProverOrConsChecker to Proofs.AbstractState.

beba53186708a907254c229f4097bb7de519b625 06-May-2015 Eugen Kuksa <eugenk@informatik.uni-bremen.de>

Move internalProverName to Formatting, define proverOrConsCheckerName in terms of it.

d102a920578426a89411cc8dabe47d7a881eab8f 07-Apr-2015 Eugen Kuksa <eugenk@informatik.uni-bremen.de>

Directly use G_prover and G_cons_checker for `provers` Instead of passing the names of the provers, we now pass the G_prover itself. This way we get more possibilities for formatting.

18d589be75aa0cbaacae9ab2884c0b07943de024 07-Apr-2015 Eugen Kuksa <eugenk@informatik.uni-bremen.de>

Use consistent naming of provers Instead of the prover set in the ProofStatus object, we use the Prover set in the proving/consistency-checking functions. This allows us to be sure to have the prover object and use the same name-retrieval functions as in the provers/consistency-checkers command.

e1e5f30cafbcd33549c60a77eee73709b6f46249 05-Mar-2015 Eugen Kuksa <eugenk@informatik.uni-bremen.de>

Move showProversOnly to Formatting module.

fdf9cef4c2e81f477f3023fb8e45f6faebfa5a65 18-Feb-2015 Eugen Kuksa <eugenk@informatik.uni-bremen.de>

Move some formatting functions to a new Formatting module.