lex.t revision 7c478bd95313f5f23a4c958a745db2134aa03244
#!./perl
print "1..51\n";
$x = 'x';
print "#1 :$x: eq :x:\n";
if ($x eq 'x') {print "ok 1\n";} else {print "not ok 1\n";}
$x = $#; # this is the register $#
if ($x eq '') {print "ok 2\n";} else {print "not ok 2\n";}
$x = $#x;
if ($x eq '-1') {print "ok 3\n";} else {print "not ok 3\n";}
$x = '\\'; # ';
if (length($x) == 1) {print "ok 4\n";} else {print "not ok 4\n";}
eval 'while (0) {
print "foo\n";
}
/^/ && (print "ok 5\n");
';
eval '$foo{1} / 1;';
if (!$@) {print "ok 6\n";} else {print "not ok 6 $@\n";}
eval '$foo = 123+123.4+123e4+123.4E5+123.4e+5+.12;';
$foo = int($foo * 100 + .5);
if ($foo eq 2591024652) {print "ok 7\n";} else {print "not ok 7 :$foo:\n";}
print <<'EOF';
ok 8
EOF
$foo = 'ok 9';
print <<EOF;
$foo
EOF
eval <<\EOE, print $@;
print <<'EOF';
ok 10
EOF
$foo = 'ok 11';
print <<EOF;
$foo
EOF
EOE
print <<`EOS` . <<\EOF;
echo ok 12
EOS
ok 13
EOF
print qq/ok 14\n/;
print qq(ok 15\n);
print qq
[ok 16\n]
;
print q<ok 17
>;
print <<; # Yow!
ok 18
# previous line intentionally left blank.
print <<E1 eq "foo\n\n" ? "ok 19\n" : "not ok 19\n";
@{[ <<E2 ]}
foo
E2
E1
print <<E1 eq "foo\n\n" ? "ok 20\n" : "not ok 20\n";
@{[
<<E2
foo
E2
]}
E1
$foo = FOO;
$bar = BAR;
$foo{$bar} = BAZ;
$ary[0] = ABC;
print "$foo{$bar}" eq "BAZ" ? "ok 21\n" : "not ok 21\n";
print "${foo}{$bar}" eq "FOO{BAR}" ? "ok 22\n" : "not ok 22\n";
print "${foo{$bar}}" eq "BAZ" ? "ok 23\n" : "not ok 23\n";
print "FOO:" =~ /$foo[:]/ ? "ok 24\n" : "not ok 24\n";
print "ABC" =~ /^$ary[$A]$/ ? "ok 25\n" : "not ok 25\n";
print "FOOZ" =~ /^$foo[$A-Z]$/ ? "ok 26\n" : "not ok 26\n";
# MJD 19980425
($X, @X) = qw(a b c d);
print "d" =~ /^$X[-1]$/ ? "ok 27\n" : "not ok 27\n";
print "a1" !~ /^$X[-1]$/ ? "ok 28\n" : "not ok 28\n";
print (((q{{\{\(}} . q{{\)\}}}) eq '{{\(}{\)}}') ? "ok 29\n" : "not ok 29\n");
$foo = "not ok 30\n";
$foo =~ s/^not /substr(<<EOF, 0, 0)/e;
Ignored
EOF
print $foo;
# Tests for new extended control-character variables
# MJD 19990227
{ my $CX = "\cX";
my $CXY ="\cXY";
$ {$CX} = 17;
$ {$CXY} = 23;
if ($ {^XY} != 23) { print "not " }
print "ok 31\n";
# Does the syntax where we use the literal control character still work?
if (eval "\$ {\cX}" != 17 or $@) { print "not " }
print "ok 32\n";
eval "\$\cN = 24"; # Literal control character
if ($@ or ${"\cN"} != 24) { print "not " }
print "ok 33\n";
if ($^N != 24) { print "not " } # Control character escape sequence
print "ok 34\n";
# Does the old UNBRACED syntax still do what it used to?
if ("$^XY" ne "17Y") { print "not " }
print "ok 35\n";
sub XX () { 6 }
$ {"\cN\cXX"} = 119;
$^N = 5; # This should be an unused ^Var.
$N = 5;
# The second caret here should be interpreted as an xor
if (($^N^XX) != 3) { print "not " }
print "ok 36\n";
# if (($N ^ XX()) != 3) { print "not " }
# print "ok 32\n";
# These next two tests are trying to make sure that
# $^FOO is always global; it doesn't make sense to `my' it.
#
eval 'my $^X;';
print "not " unless index ($@, 'Can\'t use global $^X in "my"') > -1;
print "ok 37\n";
# print "($@)\n" if $@;
eval 'my $ {^XYZ};';
print "not " unless index ($@, 'Can\'t use global $^XYZ in "my"') > -1;
print "ok 38\n";
# print "($@)\n" if $@;
# Now let's make sure that caret variables are all forced into the main package.
package Someother;
$^N = 'Someother';
$ {^Nostril} = 'Someother 2';
$ {^M} = 'Someother 3';
package main;
print "not " unless $^N eq 'Someother';
print "ok 39\n";
print "not " unless $ {^Nostril} eq 'Someother 2';
print "ok 40\n";
print "not " unless $ {^M} eq 'Someother 3';
print "ok 41\n";
}
# see if eval '', s///e, and heredocs mix
sub T {
my ($where, $num) = @_;
my ($p,$f,$l) = caller;
print "# $p:$f:$l vs /$where/\nnot " unless "$p:$f:$l" =~ /$where/;
print "ok $num\n";
}
my $test = 42;
{
# line 42 "plink"
local $_ = "not ok ";
eval q{
s/^not /<<EOT/e and T '^main:\(eval \d+\):2$', $test++;
# fuggedaboudit
EOT
print $_, $test++, "\n";
T('^main:\(eval \d+\):6$', $test++);
# line 1 "plunk"
T('^main:plunk:1$', $test++);
};
print "# $@\nnot ok $test\n" if $@;
T '^main:plink:53$', $test++;
}
# tests 47--51 start here
# tests for new array interpolation semantics:
# arrays now *always* interpolate into "..." strings.
# 20000522 MJD (mjd@plover.com)
{
my $test = 47;
eval(q(">@nosuch<" eq "><")) || print "# $@", "not ";
print "ok $test\n";
++$test;
# Look at this! This is going to be a common error in the future:
eval(q("fred@example.com" eq "fred.com")) || print "# $@", "not ";
print "ok $test\n";
++$test;
# Let's make sure that normal array interpolation still works right
# For some reason, this appears not to be tested anywhere else.
my @a = (1,2,3);
print +((">@a<" eq ">1 2 3<") ? '' : 'not '), "ok $test\n";
++$test;
# Ditto.
eval(q{@nosuch = ('a', 'b', 'c'); ">@nosuch<" eq ">a b c<"})
|| print "# $@", "not ";
print "ok $test\n";
++$test;
# This isn't actually a lex test, but it's testing the same feature
sub makearray {
my @array = ('fish', 'dog', 'carrot');
*R::crackers = \@array;
}
eval(q{makearray(); ">@R::crackers<" eq ">fish dog carrot<"})
|| print "# $@", "not ";
print "ok $test\n";
++$test;
}