/bind-9.11.3/bin/tests/system/dnssec/ |
H A D | dnssec_update_test.pl | 79 sub section { subroutine 84 section("Add a name"); 87 section("Delete the name");
|
/bind-9.11.3/bin/tests/system/nsupdate/ |
H A D | update_test.pl | 84 sub section { subroutine 89 section("Delete any leftovers from previous tests"); 104 section("Simple prerequisites in the absence of data"); 117 section ("Simple creation of data"); 120 section ("Simple prerequisites in the presence of data"); 137 section("Detailed tests of \"RRset exists (value dependent)\" prerequisites"); 152 section("Torture test of \"RRset exists (value dependent)\" prerequisites."); 179 section("Subtraction of RRsets"); 188 section("Other forms of deletion"); 199 section("Cas [all...] |
/bind-9.11.3/bin/tests/system/stress/ |
H A D | update.pl | 84 sub section { subroutine
|
/bind-9.11.3/util/ |
H A D | mandoc2docbook.pl | 17 # (section 3); it probably does not work well for program 61 sub section { subroutine 117 elsif (/^\.Sh NAME/) { section("refnamediv"); next; } 118 elsif (/^\.Sh SYNOPSIS/) { section("refsynopsisdiv"); next; } 120 section("refsect1");
|
/bind-9.11.3/lib/samples/ |
H A D | sample-request.c | 122 print_section(dns_message_t *message, int section, isc_buffer_t *buf) { argument 126 result = dns_message_sectiontotext(message, section, 137 fprintf(stderr, "failed to convert a section\n");
|
/bind-9.11.3/lib/dns/ |
H A D | tkey.c | 664 * Interpret the question section. 682 * Try the answer section, since that's where Win2000 941 * Windows 2000 needs this in the answer section, not the additional 942 * section where the RFC specifies. 1119 int section) 1124 result = dns_message_firstname(msg, section); 1127 dns_message_currentname(msg, section, name); 1138 result = dns_message_nextname(msg, section); 1301 * Win2k puts the item in the ANSWER section, while the RFC 1302 * specifies it should be in the ADDITIONAL section 1118 find_tkey(dns_message_t *msg, dns_name_t **name, dns_rdata_t *rdata, int section) argument [all...] |
H A D | rdata.c | 1235 * additional section processing. 2385 dns_rdata_updateop(dns_rdata_t *rdata, dns_section_t section) { argument 2390 switch (section) {
|
H A D | message.c | 814 dns_namelist_t *section) 818 for (curr = ISC_LIST_TAIL(*section); 994 dns_namelist_t *section; local 999 section = &msg->sections[DNS_SECTION_QUESTION]; 1031 * Run through the section, looking to see if this name 1036 result = findname(&name2, name, section); 1039 * If it is the first name in the section, accept it. 1042 * in the question section, append to the section. Note that 1043 * here in the question section thi 813 findname(dns_name_t **foundname, dns_name_t *target, dns_namelist_t *section) argument 1146 update(dns_section_t section, dns_rdataclass_t rdclass) argument 1160 auth_signed(dns_namelist_t *section) argument 1228 dns_namelist_t *section; local 1974 dns_namelist_t *section; local 2387 dns_message_firstname(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section) argument 2400 dns_message_nextname(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section) argument 2414 dns_message_currentname(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section, dns_name_t **name) argument 2426 dns_message_findname(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section, dns_name_t *target, dns_rdatatype_t type, dns_rdatatype_t covers, dns_name_t **name, dns_rdataset_t **rdataset) argument 2494 dns_message_addname(dns_message_t *msg, dns_name_t *name, dns_section_t section) argument 2506 dns_message_removename(dns_message_t *msg, dns_name_t *name, dns_section_t section) argument 3267 dns_message_sectiontotext(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section, const dns_master_style_t *style, dns_messagetextflag_t flags, isc_buffer_t *target) argument 3431 dns_message_pseudosectiontoyaml(dns_message_t *msg, dns_pseudosection_t section, const dns_master_style_t *style, dns_messagetextflag_t flags, isc_buffer_t *target) argument 3692 dns_message_pseudosectiontotext(dns_message_t *msg, dns_pseudosection_t section, const dns_master_style_t *style, dns_messagetextflag_t flags, isc_buffer_t *target) argument [all...] |
H A D | client.c | 2275 dns_section_t section; local 2341 section = DNS_SECTION_ANSWER; 2342 POST(section); 2352 section = DNS_SECTION_ANSWER; 2354 section = DNS_SECTION_AUTHORITY; 2360 result = dns_message_firstname(rcvmsg, section); 2367 dns_message_currentname(rcvmsg, section, &name); 2373 if (section == DNS_SECTION_ANSWER) { 2387 result = dns_message_nextname(rcvmsg, section); 2830 dns_section_t section local [all...] |
H A D | resolver.c | 688 * type above in the answer section as it should be from a child 4639 * If TC=1 and the question section is empty, we 4647 * Because the question section matching is not 4654 "empty question section, " 4658 log_formerr(fctx, "empty question section"); 4686 log_formerr(fctx, "question section mismatch: got %s/%s/%s", 5225 dns_section_t section; local 5282 section = DNS_SECTION_AUTHORITY; 5283 for (result = dns_message_firstname(fctx->rmessage, section); 5285 result = dns_message_nextname(fctx->rmessage, section)) { 5834 dns_section_t section; local 6122 check_section(void *arg, dns_name_t *addname, dns_rdatatype_t type, dns_section_t section) argument 6201 dns_section_t section = DNS_SECTION_ADDITIONAL; local 6449 dns_section_t section; local 7468 checknamessection(dns_message_t *message, dns_section_t section) argument [all...] |
H A D | zone.c | 778 static int message_count(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section, 12571 * Always use TCP so that we shouldn't truncate in additional section. 13144 "question section from: %s", fromtext); 13719 message_count(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section, dns_rdatatype_t type) argument 13726 result = dns_message_firstname(msg, section); 13729 dns_message_currentname(msg, section, &name); 13736 result = dns_message_nextname(msg, section);
|
/bind-9.11.3/bin/dig/ |
H A D | nslookup.c | 250 dns_section_t section) { 262 result = dns_message_firstname(msg, section); 269 dns_message_currentname(msg, section, 280 if (section != DNS_SECTION_ANSWER) 305 result = dns_message_nextname(msg, section); 317 dns_section_t section) { 329 switch (section) { 345 result = dns_message_firstname(msg, section); 352 dns_message_currentname(msg, section, 357 if (section 249 printsection(dig_query_t *query, dns_message_t *msg, isc_boolean_t headers, dns_section_t section) argument 316 detailsection(dig_query_t *query, dns_message_t *msg, isc_boolean_t headers, dns_section_t section) argument [all...] |
H A D | dighost.c | 206 int section); 229 void dump_database_section(dns_message_t *msg, int section); 292 * the child name is used for delegation (NS DS responses in AUTHORITY section) 1727 * Add a question section to a message, asking for the specified name, 2032 * based on the supplied message and section. This is used in trace and 2037 followup_lookup(dns_message_t *msg, dig_query_t *query, dns_section_t section) argument 2059 for (result = dns_message_firstname(msg, section); 2061 result = dns_message_nextname(msg, section)) { 2063 dns_message_currentname(msg, section, &name); 2065 if (section 4755 dump_database_section(dns_message_t *msg, int section) argument 4831 chase_scanname_section(dns_message_t *msg, dns_name_t *name, dns_rdatatype_t type, dns_rdatatype_t covers, int section) argument [all...] |
/bind-9.11.3/bin/named/ |
H A D | update.c | 921 * In the RFC2136 section 3.2.5, this is the pseudocode involving 1389 * Extract a single update RR from 'section' of dynamic update message 1396 get_current_rr(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section, argument 1403 dns_message_currentname(msg, section, name); 1467 * section 3.4.2.2 requires a server to ignore a SOA update request 1471 * section 3.6 requires a server to ignore a SOA update request if 1566 * Interpret the zone section. 1570 FAILC(DNS_R_FORMERR, "update zone section empty"); 1573 * The zone section must contain exactly one "question", and 1581 "update zone section contain [all...] |
H A D | query.c | 1321 dns_section_t section; local 1327 for (section = DNS_SECTION_ANSWER; 1328 section <= DNS_SECTION_ADDITIONAL; 1329 section++) { 1330 result = dns_message_findname(client->message, section, 1343 if (section == DNS_SECTION_ADDITIONAL) 1403 * We treat type A additional section processing as if it 1404 * were "any address type" additional section processing. 1510 * NS records cause both the usual additional section 1551 * section 2365 query_dns64(ns_client_t *client, dns_name_t **namep, dns_rdataset_t *rdataset, dns_rdataset_t *sigrdataset, isc_buffer_t *dbuf, dns_section_t section) argument 2547 query_filter64(ns_client_t *client, dns_name_t **namep, dns_rdataset_t *rdataset, isc_buffer_t *dbuf, dns_section_t section) argument 2685 query_addrrset(ns_client_t *client, dns_name_t **namep, dns_rdataset_t **rdatasetp, dns_rdataset_t **sigrdatasetp, isc_buffer_t *dbuf, dns_section_t section) argument 2763 query_addsoa(ns_client_t *client, dns_db_t *db, dns_dbversion_t *version, unsigned int override_ttl, isc_boolean_t isassociated, dns_section_t section) argument 5938 dns_section_t section = DNS_SECTION_ADDITIONAL; local 6595 dns_section_t section; local [all...] |
/bind-9.11.3/bin/nsupdate/ |
H A D | nsupdate.c | 2207 fprintf(stderr, "incorrect section name: %s\n", word); 2367 * For MS DNS that violates RFC 2845, section 4.2 2474 dns_section_t section; local 2563 section = DNS_SECTION_ANSWER; 2564 POST(section); 2588 section = DNS_SECTION_ANSWER; 2590 section = DNS_SECTION_AUTHORITY; 2594 result = dns_message_firstname(rcvmsg, section); 2601 dns_message_currentname(rcvmsg, section, &name); 2607 if (section 3129 dns_section_t section = DNS_SECTION_UPDATE; local [all...] |