Searched +refs:hpf +refs:mode +refs:syntax +refs:table (Results 1 - 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
/hets/doc/ |
H A D | UserGuideCommonLogic.tex | 181 is a Lisp-like syntax for CL; 243 CLIF syntax, and also recursively reads in any imported files (cf.\ Sect.~\ref{relationsInCL} for the syntax). 250 Sect.~\ref{relationsInCL}. Alternatively, CLIF syntax can be used 259 the native OWL XML syntax \cite{w3c:owl2-xml}, the human-readable 260 Manchester syntax \cite{w3c:owl2-manchester}, as well as RDF \cite{w3c:owl2-RDF-mapping}. The RDF data model has multiple possible syntaxes itself, including RDF/XML \cite{w3c04:rdf-xml} and the text-oriented Turtle syntax \cite{w3c:turtle}. 264 files. For this purpose, OWL2 Manchester syntax can be used within 284 \HetCASL syntax, where \emph{basic specifications} are unstructured 291 \begin{lstlisting}[float,label={fig:lang},caption={Syntax of a simple subset of the heterogeneous specification language. \texttt{BASIC-SPEC} and \texttt{SYMBOL-MAP} have a logic specific syntax, whil [all...] |
H A D | UserGuide.tex | 180 \HetCASL syntax, where \emph{basic specifications} are unstructured 207 specific syntax, while \texttt{ID} stands for some form of 307 types for signatures, morphisms, abstract syntax etc. This eases 354 written in JAVA to obtain the abstract syntax for an OWL file and its 364 a strongly typed variant of OWL in \CASL syntax. 452 the characteristic features of hybrid logic, both at the level of syntax and semantics. A comorphism from HybridCASL 693 with respect to the \CASL syntax, as 819 syntax needs to be used: 834 Note that according to the Haskell syntax, Haskell function 1199 to the current development graph in a .hpf fil [all...] |
Completed in 86 milliseconds