Searched defs:section (Results 1 - 12 of 12) sorted by relevance

/bind-9.6-ESV-R11/bin/tests/system/dnssec/
H A Ddnssec_update_test.pl88 sub section { subroutine
93 section("Add a name");
96 section("Delete the name");
/bind-9.6-ESV-R11/bin/tests/system/nsupdate/
H A Dupdate_test.pl93 sub section { subroutine
98 section("Delete any leftovers from previous tests");
113 section("Simple prerequisites in the absence of data");
126 section ("Simple creation of data");
129 section ("Simple prerequisites in the presence of data");
146 section("Detailed tests of \"RRset exists (value dependent)\" prerequisites");
161 section("Torture test of \"RRset exists (value dependent)\" prerequisites.");
188 section("Subtraction of RRsets");
197 section("Other forms of deletion");
208 section("Cas
[all...]
/bind-9.6-ESV-R11/bin/tests/system/stress/
H A Dupdate.pl93 sub section { subroutine
/bind-9.6-ESV-R11/bin/dig/
H A Dnslookup.c241 dns_section_t section) {
253 result = dns_message_firstname(msg, section);
260 dns_message_currentname(msg, section,
270 if (section != DNS_SECTION_ANSWER)
295 result = dns_message_nextname(msg, section);
307 dns_section_t section) {
319 switch (section) {
335 result = dns_message_firstname(msg, section);
342 dns_message_currentname(msg, section,
347 if (section
240 printsection(dig_query_t *query, dns_message_t *msg, isc_boolean_t headers, dns_section_t section) argument
306 detailsection(dig_query_t *query, dns_message_t *msg, isc_boolean_t headers, dns_section_t section) argument
[all...]
H A Ddighost.c198 int section);
226 void dump_database_section(dns_message_t *msg, int section);
290 * the child name is used for delegation (NS DS responses in AUTHORITY section)
1243 * Add a question section to a message, asking for the specified name,
1535 * based on the supplied message and section. This is used in trace and
1540 followup_lookup(dns_message_t *msg, dig_query_t *query, dns_section_t section) argument
1562 for (result = dns_message_firstname(msg, section);
1564 result = dns_message_nextname(msg, section)) {
1566 dns_message_currentname(msg, section, &name);
1568 if (section
3851 dump_database_section(dns_message_t *msg, int section) argument
3927 chase_scanname_section(dns_message_t *msg, dns_name_t *name, dns_rdatatype_t type, dns_rdatatype_t covers, int section) argument
[all...]
/bind-9.6-ESV-R11/lib/dns/
H A Dtkey.c614 * Interpret the question section.
632 * Try the answer section, since that's where Win2000
891 * Windows 2000 needs this in the answer section, not the additional
892 * section where the RFC specifies.
1070 int section)
1075 result = dns_message_firstname(msg, section);
1078 dns_message_currentname(msg, section, name);
1089 result = dns_message_nextname(msg, section);
1253 * Win2k puts the item in the ANSWER section, while the RFC
1254 * specifies it should be in the ADDITIONAL section
1069 find_tkey(dns_message_t *msg, dns_name_t **name, dns_rdata_t *rdata, int section) argument
[all...]
H A Dmessage.c823 dns_namelist_t *section)
827 for (curr = ISC_LIST_TAIL(*section);
1006 dns_namelist_t *section; local
1011 section = &msg->sections[DNS_SECTION_QUESTION];
1043 * Run through the section, looking to see if this name
1048 result = findname(&name2, name, section);
1051 * If it is the first name in the section, accept it.
1054 * in the question section, append to the section. Note that
1055 * here in the question section thi
822 findname(dns_name_t **foundname, dns_name_t *target, dns_namelist_t *section) argument
1155 update(dns_section_t section, dns_rdataclass_t rdclass) argument
1180 dns_namelist_t *section; local
1817 dns_namelist_t *section; local
2214 dns_message_firstname(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section) argument
2227 dns_message_nextname(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section) argument
2241 dns_message_currentname(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section, dns_name_t **name) argument
2253 dns_message_findname(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section, dns_name_t *target, dns_rdatatype_t type, dns_rdatatype_t covers, dns_name_t **name, dns_rdataset_t **rdataset) argument
2322 dns_message_addname(dns_message_t *msg, dns_name_t *name, dns_section_t section) argument
2334 dns_message_removename(dns_message_t *msg, dns_name_t *name, dns_section_t section) argument
3074 dns_message_sectiontotext(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section, const dns_master_style_t *style, dns_messagetextflag_t flags, isc_buffer_t *target) argument
3136 dns_message_pseudosectiontotext(dns_message_t *msg, dns_pseudosection_t section, const dns_master_style_t *style, dns_messagetextflag_t flags, isc_buffer_t *target) argument
[all...]
H A Dresolver.c568 * type above in the answer section as it should be from a child
4386 dns_section_t section; local
4443 section = DNS_SECTION_AUTHORITY;
4444 for (result = dns_message_firstname(fctx->rmessage, section);
4446 result = dns_message_nextname(fctx->rmessage, section)) {
4448 dns_message_currentname(fctx->rmessage, section, &nsec);
4924 dns_section_t section; local
4933 for (section = DNS_SECTION_ANSWER;
4934 section <= DNS_SECTION_ADDITIONAL;
4935 section
5258 dns_section_t section = DNS_SECTION_ADDITIONAL; local
5389 dns_section_t section = local
6292 checknamessection(dns_message_t *message, dns_section_t section) argument
[all...]
H A Dzone.c598 static int message_count(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section,
8507 * Always use TCP so that we shouldn't truncate in additional section.
9000 "question section from: %s", fromtext);
9527 message_count(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section, dns_rdatatype_t type) argument
9534 result = dns_message_firstname(msg, section);
9537 dns_message_currentname(msg, section, &name);
9544 result = dns_message_nextname(msg, section);
/bind-9.6-ESV-R11/bin/nsupdate/
H A Dnsupdate.c1893 fprintf(stderr, "incorrect section name: %s\n", word);
1991 * For MS DNS that violates RFC 2845, section 4.2
2081 dns_section_t section; local
2171 section = DNS_SECTION_ANSWER;
2172 POST(section);
2196 section = DNS_SECTION_ANSWER;
2198 section = DNS_SECTION_AUTHORITY;
2202 result = dns_message_firstname(rcvmsg, section);
2209 dns_message_currentname(rcvmsg, section, &name);
2215 if (section
2632 dns_section_t section = DNS_SECTION_UPDATE; local
[all...]
/bind-9.6-ESV-R11/bin/named/
H A Dquery.c1025 dns_section_t section; local
1031 for (section = DNS_SECTION_ANSWER;
1032 section <= DNS_SECTION_ADDITIONAL;
1033 section++) {
1034 result = dns_message_findname(client->message, section,
1046 if (section == DNS_SECTION_ADDITIONAL)
1099 * We treat type A additional section processing as if it
1100 * were "any address type" additional section processing.
1206 * NS records cause both the usual additional section
1245 * section
2003 query_addrrset(ns_client_t *client, dns_name_t **namep, dns_rdataset_t **rdatasetp, dns_rdataset_t **sigrdatasetp, isc_buffer_t *dbuf, dns_section_t section) argument
3539 dns_section_t section = DNS_SECTION_ADDITIONAL; local
[all...]
H A Dupdate.c851 * In the RFC2136 section 3.2.5, this is the pseudocode involving
1340 * Extract a single update RR from 'section' of dynamic update message
1347 get_current_rr(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section, argument
1354 dns_message_currentname(msg, section, name);
1423 * section 3.4.2.2 requires a server to ignore a SOA update request
1427 * section 3.6 requires a server to ignore a SOA update request if
2700 * Interpret the zone section.
2704 FAILC(DNS_R_FORMERR, "update zone section empty");
2707 * The zone section must contain exactly one "question", and
2715 "update zone section contain
[all...]

Completed in 2978 milliseconds