/bind-9.6-ESV-R11/bin/tests/system/dnssec/ |
H A D | dnssec_update_test.pl | 88 sub section { subroutine 93 section("Add a name"); 96 section("Delete the name");
|
/bind-9.6-ESV-R11/bin/tests/system/nsupdate/ |
H A D | update_test.pl | 93 sub section { subroutine 98 section("Delete any leftovers from previous tests"); 113 section("Simple prerequisites in the absence of data"); 126 section ("Simple creation of data"); 129 section ("Simple prerequisites in the presence of data"); 146 section("Detailed tests of \"RRset exists (value dependent)\" prerequisites"); 161 section("Torture test of \"RRset exists (value dependent)\" prerequisites."); 188 section("Subtraction of RRsets"); 197 section("Other forms of deletion"); 208 section("Cas [all...] |
/bind-9.6-ESV-R11/bin/tests/system/stress/ |
H A D | update.pl | 93 sub section { subroutine
|
/bind-9.6-ESV-R11/bin/dig/ |
H A D | nslookup.c | 241 dns_section_t section) { 253 result = dns_message_firstname(msg, section); 260 dns_message_currentname(msg, section, 270 if (section != DNS_SECTION_ANSWER) 295 result = dns_message_nextname(msg, section); 307 dns_section_t section) { 319 switch (section) { 335 result = dns_message_firstname(msg, section); 342 dns_message_currentname(msg, section, 347 if (section 240 printsection(dig_query_t *query, dns_message_t *msg, isc_boolean_t headers, dns_section_t section) argument 306 detailsection(dig_query_t *query, dns_message_t *msg, isc_boolean_t headers, dns_section_t section) argument [all...] |
H A D | dighost.c | 198 int section); 226 void dump_database_section(dns_message_t *msg, int section); 290 * the child name is used for delegation (NS DS responses in AUTHORITY section) 1243 * Add a question section to a message, asking for the specified name, 1535 * based on the supplied message and section. This is used in trace and 1540 followup_lookup(dns_message_t *msg, dig_query_t *query, dns_section_t section) argument 1562 for (result = dns_message_firstname(msg, section); 1564 result = dns_message_nextname(msg, section)) { 1566 dns_message_currentname(msg, section, &name); 1568 if (section 3851 dump_database_section(dns_message_t *msg, int section) argument 3927 chase_scanname_section(dns_message_t *msg, dns_name_t *name, dns_rdatatype_t type, dns_rdatatype_t covers, int section) argument [all...] |
/bind-9.6-ESV-R11/lib/dns/ |
H A D | tkey.c | 614 * Interpret the question section. 632 * Try the answer section, since that's where Win2000 891 * Windows 2000 needs this in the answer section, not the additional 892 * section where the RFC specifies. 1070 int section) 1075 result = dns_message_firstname(msg, section); 1078 dns_message_currentname(msg, section, name); 1089 result = dns_message_nextname(msg, section); 1253 * Win2k puts the item in the ANSWER section, while the RFC 1254 * specifies it should be in the ADDITIONAL section 1069 find_tkey(dns_message_t *msg, dns_name_t **name, dns_rdata_t *rdata, int section) argument [all...] |
H A D | message.c | 823 dns_namelist_t *section) 827 for (curr = ISC_LIST_TAIL(*section); 1006 dns_namelist_t *section; local 1011 section = &msg->sections[DNS_SECTION_QUESTION]; 1043 * Run through the section, looking to see if this name 1048 result = findname(&name2, name, section); 1051 * If it is the first name in the section, accept it. 1054 * in the question section, append to the section. Note that 1055 * here in the question section thi 822 findname(dns_name_t **foundname, dns_name_t *target, dns_namelist_t *section) argument 1155 update(dns_section_t section, dns_rdataclass_t rdclass) argument 1180 dns_namelist_t *section; local 1817 dns_namelist_t *section; local 2214 dns_message_firstname(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section) argument 2227 dns_message_nextname(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section) argument 2241 dns_message_currentname(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section, dns_name_t **name) argument 2253 dns_message_findname(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section, dns_name_t *target, dns_rdatatype_t type, dns_rdatatype_t covers, dns_name_t **name, dns_rdataset_t **rdataset) argument 2322 dns_message_addname(dns_message_t *msg, dns_name_t *name, dns_section_t section) argument 2334 dns_message_removename(dns_message_t *msg, dns_name_t *name, dns_section_t section) argument 3074 dns_message_sectiontotext(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section, const dns_master_style_t *style, dns_messagetextflag_t flags, isc_buffer_t *target) argument 3136 dns_message_pseudosectiontotext(dns_message_t *msg, dns_pseudosection_t section, const dns_master_style_t *style, dns_messagetextflag_t flags, isc_buffer_t *target) argument [all...] |
H A D | resolver.c | 568 * type above in the answer section as it should be from a child 4386 dns_section_t section; local 4443 section = DNS_SECTION_AUTHORITY; 4444 for (result = dns_message_firstname(fctx->rmessage, section); 4446 result = dns_message_nextname(fctx->rmessage, section)) { 4448 dns_message_currentname(fctx->rmessage, section, &nsec); 4924 dns_section_t section; local 4933 for (section = DNS_SECTION_ANSWER; 4934 section <= DNS_SECTION_ADDITIONAL; 4935 section 5258 dns_section_t section = DNS_SECTION_ADDITIONAL; local 5389 dns_section_t section = local 6292 checknamessection(dns_message_t *message, dns_section_t section) argument [all...] |
H A D | zone.c | 598 static int message_count(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section, 8507 * Always use TCP so that we shouldn't truncate in additional section. 9000 "question section from: %s", fromtext); 9527 message_count(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section, dns_rdatatype_t type) argument 9534 result = dns_message_firstname(msg, section); 9537 dns_message_currentname(msg, section, &name); 9544 result = dns_message_nextname(msg, section);
|
/bind-9.6-ESV-R11/bin/nsupdate/ |
H A D | nsupdate.c | 1893 fprintf(stderr, "incorrect section name: %s\n", word); 1991 * For MS DNS that violates RFC 2845, section 4.2 2081 dns_section_t section; local 2171 section = DNS_SECTION_ANSWER; 2172 POST(section); 2196 section = DNS_SECTION_ANSWER; 2198 section = DNS_SECTION_AUTHORITY; 2202 result = dns_message_firstname(rcvmsg, section); 2209 dns_message_currentname(rcvmsg, section, &name); 2215 if (section 2632 dns_section_t section = DNS_SECTION_UPDATE; local [all...] |
/bind-9.6-ESV-R11/bin/named/ |
H A D | query.c | 1025 dns_section_t section; local 1031 for (section = DNS_SECTION_ANSWER; 1032 section <= DNS_SECTION_ADDITIONAL; 1033 section++) { 1034 result = dns_message_findname(client->message, section, 1046 if (section == DNS_SECTION_ADDITIONAL) 1099 * We treat type A additional section processing as if it 1100 * were "any address type" additional section processing. 1206 * NS records cause both the usual additional section 1245 * section 2003 query_addrrset(ns_client_t *client, dns_name_t **namep, dns_rdataset_t **rdatasetp, dns_rdataset_t **sigrdatasetp, isc_buffer_t *dbuf, dns_section_t section) argument 3539 dns_section_t section = DNS_SECTION_ADDITIONAL; local [all...] |
H A D | update.c | 851 * In the RFC2136 section 3.2.5, this is the pseudocode involving 1340 * Extract a single update RR from 'section' of dynamic update message 1347 get_current_rr(dns_message_t *msg, dns_section_t section, argument 1354 dns_message_currentname(msg, section, name); 1423 * section 3.4.2.2 requires a server to ignore a SOA update request 1427 * section 3.6 requires a server to ignore a SOA update request if 2700 * Interpret the zone section. 2704 FAILC(DNS_R_FORMERR, "update zone section empty"); 2707 * The zone section must contain exactly one "question", and 2715 "update zone section contain [all...] |