Cross Reference: /openjdk7/jdk/src/share/classes/sun/misc/FpUtils.java

Lines Matching refs:MIN_EXPONENT
168         assert(n >= DoubleConsts.MIN_EXPONENT && n <= DoubleConsts.MAX_EXPONENT);
178         assert(n >= FloatConsts.MIN_EXPONENT && n <= FloatConsts.MAX_EXPONENT);
382         case DoubleConsts.MIN_EXPONENT-1:       // zero or subnormal
412                         DoubleConsts.MIN_EXPONENT - (DoubleConsts.SIGNIFICAND_WIDTH-1) &&
413                         exponent < DoubleConsts.MIN_EXPONENT);
418             assert( exponent >= DoubleConsts.MIN_EXPONENT &&
452         case FloatConsts.MIN_EXPONENT-1:        // zero or subnormal
482                         FloatConsts.MIN_EXPONENT - (FloatConsts.SIGNIFICAND_WIDTH-1) &&
483                         exponent < FloatConsts.MIN_EXPONENT);
488             assert( exponent >= FloatConsts.MIN_EXPONENT &&
588          * 2^MIN_EXPONENT and then by 2 ^ (scale_factor %
589          * MIN_EXPONENT) since even in a strictfp program double
591          * argument was (MIN_EXPONENT - n) and the exponent of d was a
592          * little less than -(MIN_EXPONENT - n), meaning the final
605         final int MAX_SCALE = DoubleConsts.MAX_EXPONENT + -DoubleConsts.MIN_EXPONENT +
676         final int MAX_SCALE = FloatConsts.MAX_EXPONENT + -FloatConsts.MIN_EXPONENT +
1101         case DoubleConsts.MIN_EXPONENT-1:       // zero or subnormal
1105             assert exp <= DoubleConsts.MAX_EXPONENT && exp >= DoubleConsts.MIN_EXPONENT;
1109             if (exp >= DoubleConsts.MIN_EXPONENT) {
1117                 (exp - (DoubleConsts.MIN_EXPONENT - (DoubleConsts.SIGNIFICAND_WIDTH-1)) ));
1152         case FloatConsts.MIN_EXPONENT-1:        // zero or subnormal
1156             assert exp <= FloatConsts.MAX_EXPONENT && exp >= FloatConsts.MIN_EXPONENT;
1160             if (exp >= FloatConsts.MIN_EXPONENT) {
1168                 (exp - (FloatConsts.MIN_EXPONENT - (FloatConsts.SIGNIFICAND_WIDTH-1)) ));