Lines Matching defs:field
43 * character offsets and field numbering between the new and old style field
54 * Undoubtedly, this seemed logical at the time. (Using only the field head
67 * simpler implementation, the internal representation of a field in this
95 * If a field specified by the -k option or by the +n syntax contains any
96 * modifiers, then the current global field modifiers are not inherited.
125 int field = 0;
133 field = (10 * field) + (C[i] - '0');
183 F->f_start_field = field;
192 F->f_end_field = field;
212 * New field specifiers do not inherit from the general specifier if
236 warn("-k %s is not a supported field specifier\n", arg);
242 * If the starting field exceeds a defined ending field, convention
243 * dictates that the field is ignored.
250 warn("illegal field -k %s omitted", arg);
257 * assigned to the current field.
283 * (non-option argument), the field is considered closed.
547 * old-style field definition, +NNN, or we have found a
551 * field terminal definition. (since "+joe", for instance, is
582 * actual field specifier.
598 * If no fields, then one great field. However, if the -b option was