History log of /sssd-io/src/sysv/systemd/sssd-nss.socket.in
Revision Date Author Comments Expand
e19327b3b06e723e5162f0c91cb77ba254bb3dc7 15-Mar-2017 Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com>

NSS: Ensure the NSS socket is started before any other services' sockets Although I didn't have any problem with this before I'd like to ensure that the NSS socket is always up _before_ any other (SSSD) services' sockets as they may trigger initgroups calls as some of them have SocketUser and SocketGroup set to the "sssd" user. Related: https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3322 Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Lukáš Slebodník <lslebodn@redhat.com>

b7430c4f4b98efe08d9d13d202fbb76229628b30 15-Mar-2017 Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com>

NSS: Don't set SocketUser/SocketGroup as "sssd" in sssd-nss.socket NSS service is always run as root, so there's no need to change its socket ownership to the sssd user. More than that, by setting up the SocketUser and SocketGroup to "sssd" a loop would be caused as the "sssd" would trigger an initgroups call during the NSS socket setup. The problem was found when starting up a machine with SSSD built with "--with-sssd-user=sssd" and having "sss" before "files" in the name-service switch. Related: https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3322 Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Lukáš Slebodník <lslebodn@redhat.com>

9c0c83eecf963416effee67dab55711234373fde 02-Mar-2017 Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com>

SYSTEMD: Don't mix up responders' socket and monitor activation Let's ensure that in case a responder is explicitly configured in the sssd.conf its socket won't even start. The patchset introduces a new binary that will be distributed and will be called before starting the responders' sockets, ensuring the sockets will only start in case the responder is supposed to be socket-activated and its been configured accordingly. Otherwise the responders' socket startup will fail with a quite helpful debug message leading the admins to choose between using systemd or not and what has to be done to achieve their desire. This suggestion came from Sumit Bose. The reason for adding a new binary instead of a simple python script is to avoid dragging unnecessary dependencies to sssd-common package. Resolves: https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3300 Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Lukáš Slebodník <lslebodn@redhat.com>

bd5e09bad2b0ac8a7ca78f45d90c8ebb903efaa3 01-Mar-2017 Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com>

SYSTEMD: Avoid starting a responder socket in case SSSD is not started As systemd adds "Before=sockets.target" to any socket unit by default, during the startup of the system we can end up having a responder socket up, being contacted while SSSD is shutdown. By using "DefaultDependencies=no" we ensure that sockets.target won't trigger the sockets' startup and that it only will be done when SSSD is up. The downside of using "DefaultDependencies=no" is that we have to deal with conflicts and add "Conflicts=shutdown.target" to each of the sockets unit. This patch has been suggested by Lukáš Nykrýn. Related: https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3298 Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Lukáš Slebodník <lslebodn@redhat.com>

0adcf95a423155f9c9d8062af42561402ceab4cc 01-Mar-2017 Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com>

SYSTEMD: Add "After=sssd.service" to the responders' sockets units While debugging the whole breakage reported by Stric I've noticed that the NSS socket has been starting up the NSS responder _before_ SSSD being up. As libc does initgroups on pretty much any account and initgroups checks all NSS modules in order to be precise, the nss_sss triggers the NSS responder which would try talking to the data providers which are not up uet (because SSSD is not up yet), causing the whole process to hang until libc gives up (causing a timeout on services like systemd-logind and on services depending on this one). By adding this ordering explicitly we can avoid the reported situation. Also, it has been recommend by Lukáš Nykrýn that "BindsTo", which is used to tie up two services, and After must be used together in order to avoid undefined/unexpected behavior (although it's still not mentioned in the systemd documentation). Related: https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3298 Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Lukáš Slebodník <lslebodn@redhat.com>

40e9ad2bf250cc3bfcdec7fb96031e2771160f69 23-Jan-2017 Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com>

NSS: Make NSS responder socket-activatable As part of the effort of making all responders socket-activatable, let's make the NSS responder ready for this by providing its systemd's units. In case the administrators want to use NSS responder taking advantage of socket-activation they will need to enable sssd-nss.socket and after a restart of the sssd service, the NSS socket will be ready waiting for any activity in order to start the NSS responder. Also, the NSS responder must be removed from the services line on sssd.conf. The NSS responder service is binded to the SSSD service, which means that the responder will be restarted in case SSSD is restarted and shutdown in case SSSD is shutdown/crashes. Is quite important to mention that NSS responder will always run as root. The reason behind this is that systemd calls getpwnam() and getgprnam() when "User="/"Group=" is set to something different than "root". As it's done _before_ starting NSS responder, the clients would end up hanging for a few minutes (due to "default_client_timeout"), which is something that we really want to avoid. Related: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2243 Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Březina <pbrezina@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Lukáš Slebodník <lslebodn@redhat.com>